Is Qwen-Max cheaper than Kimi v1-128k?
Yes, Qwen-Max is primarily cheaper with a starting input price of $0.067/1M tokens, which is about 76% less than Kimi v1-128k's $0.278/1M tokens.
Pricing Intelligence
When comparing Qwen-Max and Kimi v1-128k API pricing for 2026, Qwen-Max is the more cost-effective option for basic input queries. It is approximately 76% cheaper starting at $0.067/1M tokens. However, your choice should also factor in context window limits (131k vs 131k) and supported modalities.
| Feature | Qwen-Max | Kimi v1-128k |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Input Price | $0.067 / 1M tokens | $0.278 / 1M tokens |
| Model Category | Qwen | Kimi |
| Max Context Window | 131k tokens | 131k tokens |
| Supported Modalities | text, image | text, image |
| Routed Channels Count | 4 channels | 3 channels |
Yes, Qwen-Max is primarily cheaper with a starting input price of $0.067/1M tokens, which is about 76% less than Kimi v1-128k's $0.278/1M tokens.
Qwen-Max supports a maximum input context of 131,072 tokens, while Kimi v1-128k supports 131,072 tokens.